|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 25, 2010 5:40:45 GMT
Houston sends:
79 Luis Scola - $3,375,600
66 Jared Jeffries - $6,466,600 - $6,883,400
2010 HOU First
Total Income: $10,324,380
Total Outcome: $9,842,200
Detroit sends:
82 Tayshaun Prince - $10,324,380 - $11,148,760
Total Income: $9,842,200
Total Outcome: $10,324,380
i accept.. tayshaun hasn't shown all he can yet..
|
|
|
|
Post by Alvin Hendrix on May 25, 2010 5:51:14 GMT
What? No No No. Scola is SOO GOOD what are you doing Manilow?
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 25, 2010 5:53:54 GMT
sorry but i think that prince is better and is a player that i admire
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 25, 2010 19:49:03 GMT
reject. I think prince is on the decline and scola is on the rise. If it were scola and jeffries for prince maybe, but no way should a 1st be in it IMO. works for me  |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on May 25, 2010 20:59:07 GMT
Take out the 1st and I'd accept. It'd still be biased in Detroit's favour though, just not enough to reject.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil Jackson on May 25, 2010 21:01:46 GMT
agreed, no pick and I will accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh Barber on May 26, 2010 0:06:02 GMT
I accept as it is now... I'd take Prince over no-defense, undersized Scola any day
|
|
|
|
Post by Alvin Hendrix on May 26, 2010 3:00:30 GMT
Taking out the 1st balances things a little better. though I think Scola is on the rise. Accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe Dumars on May 26, 2010 4:46:21 GMT
Well I'd first like to accept this trade.
Second, I think that this trade is extremely fair. Jared Jeffries was added for cap reasons, so he's irrelevant, Houston's first round pick is going to mid-late 20's, so its not like the pick I'm getting is anything great, also, Scola's contract ends after this season, a season in which I'm not really trying to contend for anything, so really what this trade comes down to is how you view the players.
Houston says he likes Prince, I'm not Prince's biggest fan. I like Scola's game, but at the same time, his contract expires, so I get the draft pick too.
I think the trade committee is overstepping their bounds with rejecting trades like this. I understand that they are looking out for fairness and "realism," but really, this is a trade of two players that are rated in the 80's. Its not like this is an extremely bad trade for either side. I'd like for those that rejected this trade to go back and look at it, and what the trade committee is here for. Yea, go ahead and veto trades that are ridiculous like the LeBron deals that have been going on, but come on, this deal involves one player that is rated in the 80's. Let's not overstep our bounds here guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 26, 2010 10:24:01 GMT
Well I'd first like to accept this trade. Second, I think that this trade is extremely fair. Jared Jeffries was added for cap reasons, so he's irrelevant, Houston's first round pick is going to mid-late 20's, so its not like the pick I'm getting is anything great, also, Scola's contract ends after this season, a season in which I'm not really trying to contend for anything, so really what this trade comes down to is how you view the players. Houston says he likes Prince, I'm not Prince's biggest fan. I like Scola's game, but at the same time, his contract expires, so I get the draft pick too. I think the trade committee is overstepping their bounds with rejecting trades like this. I understand that they are looking out for fairness and "realism," but really, this is a trade of two players that are rated in the 80's. Its not like this is an extremely bad trade for either side. I'd like for those that rejected this trade to go back and look at it, and what the trade committee is here for. Yea, go ahead and veto trades that are ridiculous like the LeBron deals that have been going on, but come on, this deal involves one player that is rated in the 80's. Let's not overstep our bounds here guys. what about if you add 2011 Det 1st pick on the trade maybe the comitee will accept it.. you will surely be promoted and the 2011 1st pick won't be very high in prospect |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on May 26, 2010 11:52:42 GMT
Actually, Detroit sold me on his explanation. I accept.
That makes it 3 to 2. Still waiting on George Karl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 26, 2010 11:59:45 GMT
Actually, Detroit sold me on his explanation. I accept. That makes it 3 to 2. Still waiting on George Karl. what trade do you accept just to make it clear? the initial trade? |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on May 26, 2010 12:09:13 GMT
Actually, Detroit sold me on his explanation. I accept. That makes it 3 to 2. Still waiting on George Karl. what trade do you accept just to make it clear? the initial trade? Yes, the original trade. |
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 26, 2010 15:08:58 GMT
what trade do you accept just to make it clear? the initial trade? Yes, the original trade. thanks Boston.. |
|
|
|
Post by Phil Jackson on May 26, 2010 15:44:26 GMT
I switch to accept the trade as is, good explanation.
|
|
|
|
Post by George Karl on May 26, 2010 17:29:14 GMT
accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Malinow on May 28, 2010 7:01:26 GMT
so is this trade accepted?
|
|
|
|
Post by wtfproductionsftw on May 28, 2010 21:39:41 GMT
Well I'd first like to accept this trade. Second, I think that this trade is extremely fair. Jared Jeffries was added for cap reasons, so he's irrelevant, Houston's first round pick is going to mid-late 20's, so its not like the pick I'm getting is anything great, also, Scola's contract ends after this season, a season in which I'm not really trying to contend for anything, so really what this trade comes down to is how you view the players. Houston says he likes Prince, I'm not Prince's biggest fan. I like Scola's game, but at the same time, his contract expires, so I get the draft pick too. I think the trade committee is overstepping their bounds with rejecting trades like this. I understand that they are looking out for fairness and "realism," but really, this is a trade of two players that are rated in the 80's. Its not like this is an extremely bad trade for either side. I'd like for those that rejected this trade to go back and look at it, and what the trade committee is here for. Yea, go ahead and veto trades that are ridiculous like the LeBron deals that have been going on, but come on, this deal involves one player that is rated in the 80's. Let's not overstep our bounds here guys. Yeah I deffinateley regret some of MY offers but this looks like a decent trade plus I did some research so yippy... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on May 31, 2010 8:14:24 GMT
Trade Finalized.
|
|
Houston Rockets
LA Clippers
Boston Celtics
New York Knicks
New Jersey Nets
Detroit Pistons
Denver Nuggets